Posted by
intane on Monday, December 21, 2009 10:23:36 PM
Different Scopes for Different Folks :
Now
that we understand these basic points of telescope performance and
mounting, we can discuss the three basic optical designs of telescopes:
the refractor, the reflector, and the compound (or catadioptric)
telescope.
A Apochromatic Refractor is what most non-astronomers think of when they hear the word
"telescope." Its tube is most often long and skinny, mounted on a
tripod, with a lens at one end and the eyepiece at the other.
Refractors were the first type of telescope invented, and the finest
refractors still provide the best images of any design for a given
aperture. They are often chosen by observers with a dominant interest
in the planets and Moon, because they can provide sharp, high-contrast
views at high magnification and are less bothered by atmospheric
"seeing" than the other designs. They also require less maintenance
than reflectors or compound scopes, and are therefore popular with
beginners. The refractor’s good performance at high power and relative
insensitivity to light pollution makes it a good choice for a
city-based observer, as the design performs best on the objects that
are most easily seen from urban or suburban locations.
These
advantages do not come without a price — literally: refractors are the
most expensive telescopes per inch of aperture. Big refractors can cost
several thousand dollars, and still are considered too small in
aperture for serious deep-sky observing. The long focal length of most
refractors restricts the field of view, making it difficult to take in
large extended objects like some clusters of stars. And the long tube,
with the eyepiece located at the back end, requires a tall tripod,
which, if poorly made, can allow the scope to shake and shimmy in the
breeze, rendering high-powered observing difficult.
The
reflector uses a mirror, rather than a lens, to gather and focus light.
By far the most common design is the Newtonian reflector, which places
a concave (dish-shaped) primary mirror at the bottom end of the
telescope tube. A small secondary mirror at the other end directs the
focused light out the side of the tube and into the eyepiece.
Newtonians offer the largest aperture available at given price, and
when well made, they can provide sharp, contrasty views that rival all
but the finest refractors. A Newtonian’s low center of gravity and
eyepiece location at the top of the tube allow for comfortable viewing
with a more compact mounting, which can be made stable with much less
bulk and cost than the tall mounting required by a refractor of similar
aperture.
Big Apochromatic Refractor of 10" aperture and larger on Dobsonian mountings are the
most popular telescopes for astronomers who seek to gather "buckets of
light" for deep-sky observing. These giant scopes perform best at
remote dark sky sites, away from the glare of city lights. The value
and versatility of the smaller 4.5" to 8" Newtonians, mounted either
equatorially or as Dobsonians, makes them a fine choice for the
beginner with general interests.
Newtonian
reflectors require occasional maintenance. Unlike the lenses in a
refractor, the mirrors in a reflector need periodic alignment, or
collimation, for best performance. While many beginners seem
intimidated by collimation, it’s really not difficult, and takes only a
few minutes once you get the hang of it. A reflector’s tube is also
more open to air and humidity than that of a refractor, and if left
uncovered the mirrors can accumulate dust and grime, which necessitates
occasional cleaning. While these maintenance concerns are often
overstated, a Newtonian may not be the right choice for someone who
finds the prospect of occasional tinkering with the telescope
unappealing.
The
most modern of the three common designs for telescope focuser is the
compound, or catadioptric type, which uses a combination of lenses and
mirrors to gather and focus light. The greatest advantage of this
design is its compactness: the lenses and mirrors "fold up" the light
path inside the telescope, reducing large-aperture scopes to a
manageable size. If an equatorial mounting is desired, the smaller tube
can be carried on lighter and more economical mounts than that required
by a Newtonian of the same size. Compound telescopes are most popular
with observers who desire both generous aperture and an equatorial
mounting in a transportable package.
The
names Schmidt-Cassegrain and Maksutov-Cassegrain refer to specific
designs of compound telescope focuser, which use differently shaped lenses and
mirrors to achieve a similar result. The Maksutov is often cited as
offering better image quality, though there is little in the way of
optical theory to support this opinion. Most probably the Maksutov has
developed its reputation as the superior catadioptric design because
its spherical optical surfaces are easier to make to very high
precision than the more complex shapes demanded by the Schmidt. As a
result, if a telescope maker practices anything less than the strictest
quality control, their "average" Maksutov will outperform their
"average" Schmidt. In top-quality telescopes from careful
manufacturers, both designs can yield excellent images.
There
are a few drawbacks to all compound designs. As in any telescope that
employs mirrors, occasional alignment is required for peak performance.
The cost of a compound is higher than that of a Newtonian of the same
aperture, though still lower than the cost of a comparably sized
refractor. Most significantly for the planetary observer, the secondary
mirror in a compound is much larger than that in a Newtonian, and its
presence in the light path of the scope reduces contrast somewhat for
high-powered viewing. In general, astronomers who desire a highly
capable, easily transportable telescope find these worthwhile
compromises, and have made the compound scopes very popular.
Price is a Consideration :
Budget
is a factor in almost every telescope purchase decision, but there are
at least three major price-related pitfalls to be avoided.
Don’t
buy a flimsy, el cheapo scope with the intention of getting a taste of
the sky and upgrading later. Many of those scopes are so poor-quality
and frustrating that they can turn budding stargazers off of astronomy
for good!
On
the other hand, don’t give up on astronomy if the scope of your dreams
is financially out of reach at this moment. There are many reasonably
priced, high-quality beginner’s scopes that can reveal incredible
wonders, while helping a novice define his or her particular observing
interest.
Finally,
if you are one of the fortunate few for whom price represents little
obstacle, think twice before buying the biggest, most expensive
telescope in stock. Many of the large, fully featured scopes favored by
experienced observers are also the most complicated, and are too much
to grasp for someone still trying to find the Big Dipper!
What About Astrophotography?
Before
concluding, here’s a quick word for the beginner who wants to jump
right into astrophotography through their new telescope focuser: Don’t! At
least, not until you have taken some time to learn the sky and become
familiar with operating your scope. Photography of the heavens can be a
wonderfully rewarding pastime, but is a combination of art and science
with a steep learning curve that can discourage beginners who try to
take on too much at once. Of course, if astrophotography is a primary
interest there is nothing wrong with selecting a first scope based on
its easy adaptability to camera work in the future. While most
telescopes can be used for picture-taking (with varying prospects for
success), the most important qualifications for a photographic
instrument are a rock-solid equatorial mounting, and ease of attaching
a camera so that it can be focused. For a variety of technical and
economic reasons, compound telescopes of 8" aperture and larger are
most popular for photography. They also make fine instruments for
general observing.
The Bottom Line
Which, then, is the right telescope? That’s a decision that must be made individually, but the three best pieces of advice are:
The best telescope(Apochromatic Refractor)
for you is the one you will use most often. A huge, optically wonderful
scope will bring no joy if it is consigned to the closet!
All
else being equal, a larger-aperture (diameter) telescope will reveal
more in the night sky than a smaller one ("I know, already!" you may be
thinking.)
Buy from a company that’s knowledgeable about telescopes and astronomy, and who will support you even after your purchase (since you will likely have questions).
The
advice is to select a well-made telescope, of a design matched as well
as possible to your primary observing interest and most frequent
observing site. Make sure it’s a size that can be handled easily (by
your standards and no one else’s) and used often, and you will enjoy a
lifetime of awe and wonder under the stars!
from:
intane